<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEO-Wissen &#187; Linkbuilding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seo-wissen.de/category/linkbuilding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seo-wissen.de</link>
	<description>Suchmaschinenoptimierung</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 11:30:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Linkbuilding Tipps</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-wissen.de/2010/03/06/linkbuilding-tipps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seo-wissen.de/2010/03/06/linkbuilding-tipps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 11:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linkbuilding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-wissen.de/?p=140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hier möchte Euch einen interessanten Artikel und ein Seminar zum Thema Linbuilding nicht vorenthalten.
Die amerikanische Website SEO Book beschäftigt sich intensiv mit dem Thema SEO, Linkbuidling uvm.
Auszug aus dem Artikel in Englisch:
Link Building&#8230; Time-intensive. Frustrating. Sometimes confusing.  Yet Unavoidable. Because ultimately, it&#8217;s still the trump card for  higher rankings.
Many of us have been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hier möchte Euch einen interessanten Artikel und ein Seminar zum Thema Linbuilding nicht vorenthalten.</p>
<p>Die amerikanische Website <a title="seo book" href="http://www.seobook.com/archives/001792.shtml" target="_blank">SEO Book </a>beschäftigt sich intensiv mit dem Thema SEO, Linkbuidling uvm.</p>
<p>Auszug aus dem Artikel in Englisch:</p>
<p>Link Building&#8230; Time-intensive. Frustrating. Sometimes confusing.  Yet Unavoidable. Because ultimately, it&#8217;s still the trump card for  higher rankings.</p>
<p>Many of us have been hoping that it would go  away. In Brett Tabke&#8217;s 5/18 <a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/robots.txt">Robots.txt</a> entry, he  echoed a sentiment that many, many webmasters hold on to as a hope:</p>
<blockquote><p>What happens to all those Wavers that think  [i]Getting Links = SEO[/i] when that majority of the Google algo is  devalued in various ways?  Wavers built their fortunes on &#8220;links=seo&#8221;.  When that goes away, the Wavers have zero to hold on to.</p></blockquote>
<p>The pertinent questions:</p>
<ol>
<li>Will link building still be  very important for rankings in the medium term?</li>
<li>When will link  popularity be devalued in favor of other algo elements (that are less  tedious, from a webmaster&#8217;s point of view)?</li>
</ol>
<p>The answers:</p>
<ol>
<li>Sorry, but link building is still going to be the SEO  trump card for the foreseeable future.</li>
<li>I wouldn&#8217;t hold your  breath for search engine algorithms to place less importance on link  popularity until the Semantic Web arrives, or maybe when HTTP gets  replaced by a new protocol. Because links are still the basic connector,  the basic relationship, on the Web. And for the forseeable future  they&#8217;re going to be the easiest way for a computer program to judge the  importance and trustworthiness of a Web page.</li>
</ol>
<p>What <em>will</em> happen to the way search algorithms score links is already happening.  The Google algo has become much more elegant and advanced, devaluing  staggering amount of links that <em>shouldn&#8217;t</em> count, and placing  more emphasis on <em>trusted</em> links. And the trust and juice given  by those links is then <em>verified</em> by elements like user data,  domain age, and other relatively hard-to-spoof factors.</p>
<p>But  please, don&#8217;t fool yourself. Links that <em>should</em> count are still  the key to rankings (in Google, at least — and MSN and Yahoo! are only a  few short years behind). In that spirit, Aaron and <a href="http://www.andyhagans.com/">I</a> have created our 101 Ways to  Build (and Not Build) Links. (Yeah, it just so happened that there were  exactly 101!)</p>
<p>Oh, and mad props to our inspiration, <a href="http://www.searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=2160301">131  Legitimate Link Building Strategies</a>, one of the original authority  documents on link building. It was just getting a bit rusty, that&#8217;s all  (&#8220;Host your own Web Ring&#8221;?). Anyway, enjoy the update.</p>
<p>Den vollständigen Beitrag könnt Ihr direkt bei <a title="SEO Book" href="http://www.seobook.com/archives/001792.shtml" target="_blank">SEO Book </a>nachlesen.</p>
<p>Wir werden uns immer wieder einmal mit den vorgeschlagenen Tipps beschäftigen und geben dann in diesem Blog Feedback, wie die Tipps ind er Praxis funktionieren</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seo-wissen.de/2010/03/06/linkbuilding-tipps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

